AIHA University has published 11 technical frameworks on critical subjects and areas of practice in occupational and environmental health and safety as part of the association’s commitment to serve OEHS professionals and protect workers’ health worldwide. Technical frameworks are intended to provide practitioners and stakeholders with baselines of knowledge on the components of OEHS subject areas. A technical framework may include guidance on what to consider when addressing a topic or seeking professional development within a domain.

Each technical framework is authorized by the Content Portfolio Advisory Group, created by a team of subject matter experts and qualified OEHS professionals, and vetted by AIHA members to ensure that the content is validated under the current standard of care. The review stage provides consensus on the current state of practice and establishes credibility when building coalitions with other allied professionals in roles such as human resources, occupational health, and risk management.

TECHNICAL FRAMEWORKS A central focus of each technical framework is the identification of professional roles or tiers of competency that are necessary to responsibly complete work in each OEHS subject area. Technical frameworks may include specific knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) for each role or tier of competency as well as supporting experience or skills that help practitioners properly fulfill identified roles. Technical frameworks are not intended to establish practitioner criteria or requirements but to guide professionals on important considerations for their work and professional development. They can also answer important questions on each OEHS topic, such as: •How is this subject viewed by the OEHS community? •What are the key terms in this subject area? •What KSAs should practitioners in this area have or consider obtaining? •What topics or components of work should be considered?

Following are descriptions of the topics covered by the existing 11 technical frameworks, plus another that is currently in development.

“Guidance on Use of Direct Reading Instruments.” This technical framework outlines steps for conscientious use of all types of direct reading instruments, using a model that places trust in the users of these instruments. Four tiers of competency are established based on progressive and verifiable KSAs that inform instrument use, management, selection, and qualification. A detailed guidance section shares lessons from the authors, with the aim of helping to prevent potentially disastrous misapplications, and reinforces the importance of using systemic evaluation to establish instruments as fit for purpose.

“Legionella.” Partnerships among professionals in healthcare, property management, and water systems are critical to ensuring proper management of risks posed by Legionella bacteria and effective outbreak response. This technical framework identifies three key roles for Legionella control in building water systems: a competent technician who executes monitoring plans and conducts risk assessments, a responder professional who leads outbreak investigations and mitigations, and a program professional who develops and manages water management programs to minimize risks of illness related to Legionella.

“Big Data.” One of the greatest challenges facing modern OEHS is adapting to the advent of Big Data. This technical framework establishes three industrial hygiene roles important to the use of Big Data: IH technicians for standardized data collection and basic analysis, advanced IH professionals for developing and implementing data management plans, and IH data experts for leading projects and aligning technology-enabled solutions. Each tier of KSAs outlined in this technical framework emphasizes the execution of high-quality data collection, communication, and privacy protection. This technical framework is essential for OEHS professionals tasked with commissioning continuous real-time detection systems.

“A One-of-a-Kind Resource for All IAQ/IEQ Practitioners.” Jointly approved by AIHA and the Indoor Air Quality Association, the indoor air quality and indoor environmental quality technical framework establishes a diverse set of 94 KSAs across eight domains of competence for assessing and mitigating contaminants and stressors in the built environment and building envelope. Almost all OEHS professionals can find a KSA in this technical framework that they can improve upon in their own careers to benefit their professional capabilities.

“Occupational Exposure Banding Process.” Occupational exposure bands offer essential guidance in situations where occupational exposure limits have not been established. The OEB technical framework provides KSAs for IHs, chemical risk assessors, and toxicologists who are responsible for interpreting complex and sometimes disparate sources of technical information and literature data to establish a range of tolerable exposures among potentially significant uncertainty.

“A Resource for Respiratory Protection Programs.” This technical framework establishes KSAs necessary to implement effective respiratory protection programs (RPPs) for four critical stakeholders: employers or users, fit testers, supervisors, and RPP administrators. The technical framework also addresses the following 12 program elements: RPP requirements; medical evaluations; training; respirator fit testing; hazard determination; respirator selection; respirator maintenance, care, and storage; proper use of respirators; breathing air quality and use with respirators; regulatory framework; documentation; and program evaluation. This technical framework provides a robust basis for establishing the roles, responsibilities, accountabilities, and authorities for successful RPPs.

“The Keys to Effective Presentation of Your Business Case.” Established by AIHA’s Leadership and Management Committee, this technical framework provides OEHS practitioners with an easy-to-follow, seven-step process for establishing a business value proposition. The text outlines the application of the hierarchy of controls in a cost/benefit regimen tied to operational management. Establishing a business value proposition allows practitioners to assign financial and other tangible benefits and costs to risk management decisions as well as present defensible risk control options in terms that the corporate suite can understand.